• Our Team
  • Initiatives
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Support Us
  • Donate

Can You Sue for Circumcision?

Let’s talk about the question no one wants to ask out loud—but more and more people are Googling:

Can you sue for circumcision?

If you’re here, odds are you’ve started to connect the dots: that your body was permanently altered without your consent. That a decision was made—by parents, doctors, or hospital policy—on your behalf, when you were just hours or days old. A part of you was cut off, for reasons that weren’t urgent, weren’t medically necessary, and weren’t yours to make.

And now, years or even decades later, you’re wondering:

Is there any legal accountability?

Let’s break it down—honestly, personally, and without shame. Because no, this isn’t about making anyone feel like a victim. It’s about asking the uncomfortable questions we should’ve been asking all along.

 

First, Let’s Get One Thing Straight: You Didn’t Consent

That’s the root of this entire conversation.

You were a newborn. You couldn’t speak. Couldn’t object. Couldn’t say:

“Hey, maybe don’t cut off the most sensitive part of my body for no reason.”

So someone else signed the paperwork. Someone else said yes to a surgery that removed 20,000+ nerve endings, eliminated a natural protective mechanism, and permanently changed the way you experience pleasure and sex.

And here’s the kicker: they didn’t even need a medical reason.

They just needed to say it was “normal.” Or “cleaner.” Or “cultural.”

Imagine that happening to any other body part. A doctor slicing off a baby’s earlobes because “they get infected sometimes.” There’d be outrage. Lawsuits. Protests.

But when it happens to the penis? Silence.

Until now.

 

So…Can You Actually Sue?

Yes—but it’s complicated.

You can sue, in theory. There are legal precedents. There are cases. But most of them hit the same roadblocks:

  • Statutes of limitations (laws that say you must file within X years after the event)
  • Parental consent (your parents “agreed” to it on your behalf)
  • Judicial bias (circumcision is still seen as “routine” in many U.S. courtrooms)

But let’s dig deeper into each one.

 

1. Statute of Limitations: The Clock Is Ticking

In most U.S. states, you lose the ability to file a medical malpractice or bodily injury lawsuit by age 18 or 21. Some states extend that window slightly if the person only recently became aware of the harm. But once the window closes, it’s hard—if not impossible—to sue.

That’s messed up.

You can’t consent as a baby, but you’re expected to file legal action as one? You’re held accountable for someone else’s decision, even if you didn’t understand the damage until your 30s?

Yeah, no.

That’s why some advocates are pushing to extend or eliminate the statute of limitations for non-consensual infant circumcision. Because trauma, grief, and anger don’t always surface on a schedule.

 

2. Parental Consent: Can Your Parents Just Sign Away Your Rights?

Here’s the shady part: most doctors rely on parental consent to justify infant circumcision.

But consent is only valid if it’s informed. And most parents aren’t told:

  • That the foreskin has important functions
  • That the surgery removes thousands of nerve endings
  • That there are real risks (including meatal stenosis, hemorrhage, infection, and death)
  • That every major medical body outside the U.S. says it’s not necessary

If your parents weren’t fully informed, and you were harmed as a result, you may have a case. Especially if you experienced complications, were circumcised without documentation, or if the procedure deviated from standard medical practice.

In some rare cases, men have successfully sued hospitals and doctors for unauthorized or botched circumcisions. More often, it’s a difficult uphill battle.

But difficult ≠ impossible.

 

3. Legal Precedent: Are There Real Cases?

Yes. Here are just a few:

  • Boldt v. Boldt (Oregon, 2007): A custody battle over a father wanting to circumcise his 12-year-old son. The court ruled in favor of the son, who objected.
  • Nebus v. Hironimus (Florida, 2014): Another custody battle. The court ruled in favor of the father, forcing a 4-year-old to undergo circumcision despite the mother’s objections. Public outrage followed.
  • Doctors Opposing Circumcision v. Swedish Medical Center (Washington, 2011): A case where an advocacy group sued a hospital for promoting circumcision without proper disclosure. The court dismissed it, but it sparked national conversation.

There are also a growing number of individual lawsuits filed by circumcised men against hospitals, doctors, and even state medical boards. Most have been settled quietly. Few have gone to trial.

But they’re happening. And with every new case, the legal landscape shifts.

 

What If You Want to Do Something—But Don’t Want to Sue?

Totally fair. Not everyone wants to hire a lawyer or take on a years-long legal fight.

There are other ways to push back:

  • File a complaint with your state’s medical board or health department
  • Write a letter to the hospital that circumcised you
  • Join an advocacy group like Intact America or Your Whole Baby
  • Tell your story publicly—on social media, in blogs, or in conversation

Because your voice matters. And your story might be the one that makes someone else stop, think, and say:

“Wait, why are we still doing this?”

 

You Deserve to Ask These Questions

If you’re reading this, feeling a knot in your stomach, or an ache you can’t quite name, let me say something clearly:

You’re not broken. You’re not overreacting. You’re not alone.

You were born whole. Someone took something from you before you could understand what it was.

That grief? It’s valid.
That anger? It’s earned.
That curiosity? It’s power.

Whether you pursue legal action or not, you deserve answers. You deserve the truth. You deserve bodily autonomy—even if it’s decades late.

 

Final Thought: Justice Isn’t Just a Courtroom Word

Justice looks different for everyone. For some, it’s filing a lawsuit. For others, it’s breaking the cycle with their own kids. For many, it’s just finally understanding what happened—and naming it for what it was.

Not medicine. Not hygiene. Not tradition.

Violation. Without consent. Disguised as care.

You don’t need permission to be angry.
You don’t need a lawsuit to reclaim your story.

But you do have the right to ask:

“What was done to me?”
“Why wasn’t I protected?”
“And who will speak up for the next generation?”

Maybe that voice is yours.

Resources:

If this made you think, share it. Speak up. Stay curious.

Because silence never stopped injustice. But truth? It just might.

Join us in defending bodily autonomy—every boy deserves control over his own body.

Author

No Comments

Post a Comment

Marilyn

Marilyn Fayre Milos, multiple award winner for her humanitarian work to end routine infant circumcision in the United States and advocating for the rights of infants and children to genital autonomy, has written a warm and compelling memoir of her path to becoming “the founding mother of the intactivist movement.” Needing to support her family as a single mother in the early sixties, Milos taught banjo—having learned to play from Jerry Garcia (later of The Grateful Dead)—and worked as an assistant to comedian and social critic Lenny Bruce, typing out the content of his shows and transcribing court proceedings of his trials for obscenity. After Lenny’s death, she found her voice as an activist as part of the counterculture revolution, living in Haight Ashbury in San Francisco during the 1967 Summer of Love, and honed her organizational skills by creating an alternative education open classroom (still operating) in Marin County. 

After witnessing the pain and trauma of the circumcision of a newborn baby boy when she was a nursing student at Marin College, Milos learned everything she could about why infants were subjected to such brutal surgery. The more she read and discovered, the more convinced she became that circumcision had no medical benefits. As a nurse on the obstetrical unit at Marin General Hospital, she committed to making sure parents understood what circumcision entailed before signing a consent form. Considered an agitator and forced to resign in 1985, she co-founded NOCIRC (National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers) and began organizing international symposia on circumcision, genital autonomy, and human rights. Milos edited and published the proceedings from the above-mentioned symposia and has written numerous articles in her quest to end circumcision and protect children’s bodily integrity. She currently serves on the board of directors of Intact America.

Georganne

Georganne Chapin is a healthcare expert, attorney, social justice advocate, and founding executive director of Intact America, the nation’s most influential organization opposing the U.S. medical industry’s penchant for surgically altering the genitals of male children (“circumcision”). Under her leadership, Intact America has definitively documented tactics used by U.S. doctors and healthcare facilities to pathologize the male foreskin, pressure parents into circumcising their sons, and forcibly retract the foreskins of intact boys, creating potentially lifelong, iatrogenic harm. 

Chapin holds a BA in Anthropology from Barnard College, and a Master’s degree in Sociomedical Sciences from Columbia University. For 25 years, she served as president and chief executive officer of Hudson Health Plan, a nonprofit Medicaid insurer in New York’s Hudson Valley. Mid-career, she enrolled in an evening law program, where she explored the legal and ethical issues underlying routine male circumcision, a subject that had interested her since witnessing the aftermath of the surgery conducted on her younger brother. She received her Juris Doctor degree from Pace University School of Law in 2003, and was subsequently admitted to the New York Bar. As an adjunct professor, she taught Bioethics and Medicaid and Disability Law at Pace, and Bioethics in Dominican College’s doctoral program for advanced practice nurses.

In 2004, Chapin founded the nonprofit Hudson Center for Health Equity and Quality, a company that designs software and provides consulting services designed to reduce administrative complexities, streamline and integrate data collection and reporting, and enhance access to care for those in need. In 2008, she co-founded Intact America.

Chapin has published many articles and op-ed essays, and has been interviewed on local, national and international television, radio and podcasts about ways the U.S. healthcare system prioritizes profits over people’s basic needs. She cites routine (nontherapeutic) infant circumcision as a prime example of a practice that wastes money and harms boys and the men they will become. This Penis Business: A Memoir is her first book.