• Our Team
  • Initiatives
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Support Us
  • Donate

How Circumcision Affects the Early Bonding Process Between Mother and Child

When we talk about the early days of motherhood, we imagine soft lullabies, gentle embraces, and the beginnings of a bond that’s designed by nature to last a lifetime. But for some mothers and their newborns, this idyllic start is disrupted by the unexpected, unnecessary trauma of circumcision.

“Gaensbauer reported that trauma experienced by preverbal infants resulted in ‘symptomatology consistent with typical post-traumatic diagnostic criteria…The [adverse] developmental implications of early trauma, particularly if it is severe, appear to be significant.’ Neonates exposed to preverbal trauma (e.g., unanesthetized circumcision) may subsequently benefit from psychotherapeutic counseling.” 

Scientific Research Publishing

While the conversation around circumcision often focuses on cultural, religious, or perceived medical benefits, few address the emotional and psychological impact it can have on the mother-child relationship. Let’s dive into this rarely discussed but critical aspect of the circumcision debate.

 

The Sacred Bond: Why Early Connection Matters

The first days after birth are a crucial time for bonding between mother and child. Skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, and gentle nurturing lay the foundation for emotional security, trust, and attachment. These interactions are essential for a newborn’s development and the mother’s psychological well-being.

When a newborn is circumcised, this delicate process is interrupted. The infant, just days old and completely dependent, experiences intense pain during the procedure. This pain triggers a cascade of physiological stress responses, which disrupt the baby’s sense of safety and interfere with the mother’s ability to comfort and connect with her child.

 

The Trauma of Circumcision

Circumcision is not a benign procedure. Studies show that newborns experience acute pain during circumcision, even with anesthesia, which is rarely administered in a way that completely blocks the discomfort. The trauma of the procedure floods the infant’s body with stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline.

“Over a dozen studies confirm the extreme pain of circumcision. It has been described as ‘among the most painful [procedures] performed in neonatal medicine.’ In one study, researchers concluded that the pain was ‘severe and persistent.’ Increases in heart rate of 55 beats per minute have been recorded, about a 50 percent increase over the baseline. After circumcision, the level of blood cortisol increased by a factor of three to four times the level prior to circumcision. Investigators reported, ‘This level of pain would not be tolerated by older patients.” 

Circumcision Resource Center

But here’s the kicker: this a physical—and an emotional event. Infants are highly sensitive to touch, tone, and emotion. During and after circumcision, the baby’s cries of pain signal distress to the medical staff and, more importantly, to the mother. Many mothers report feeling helpless, anxious, or even traumatized themselves upon hearing their baby’s cries or seeing their child post-procedure.

You might also be interested in: 5 Compelling Arguments Against Circumcision

 

Interrupting the Bond

For bonding to occur, a baby must feel safe. After circumcision, the baby is often in pain, fussy, and difficult to soothe. This alters the natural rhythm of early interactions. Instead of being able to focus on bonding, mothers may spend hours or even days trying to calm a baby who is inconsolable due to the pain and shock of the procedure.

Furthermore, circumcision often leads to physical separation. Many hospitals perform the procedure in a separate room, away from the mother. This removes the baby from the mother’s comforting presence at a time when proximity is vital for attachment. For breastfeeding mothers, this separation can delay the establishment of a strong nursing routine, as pain and stress may make it harder for the baby to latch.

 

Long-Term Effects on Trust and Attachment

The early bond between mother and child sets the stage for lifelong attachment. Research in developmental psychology shows that early trauma can have long-lasting effects on a child’s sense of security and trust. The pain and stress associated with circumcision may condition the baby to associate the world—and even its caregiver—with danger rather than safety.

For mothers, the psychological toll can also be profound. Many women feel guilt or regret after consenting to circumcision, especially if they later learn that the procedure was unnecessary or that complications arose. This guilt can create emotional distance, undermining the bond that’s so critical in the first months of life.

 

The Role of the Medical System

It’s impossible to talk about circumcision without addressing the role of the medical system. In many cases, parents are not given full information about the risks and consequences of the procedure. The decision is often framed as routine or even beneficial, leaving mothers unaware of the potential impact on their baby’s well-being and their own emotional health.

Scary truth? Many doctors are openly and blatantly pushing pro-circumcision propaganda—check out this article debunking a doctor’s claims

Some mothers report feeling pressured by doctors or family members to consent to circumcision, even when their instincts tell them otherwise. This pressure can add to feelings of helplessness and resentment, further complicating the mother-child bond.

 

Why This Matters for Fathers, Too

Although the focus here is on mothers, fathers are not immune to the emotional fallout of circumcision. Many fathers who were circumcised themselves may feel conflicted about subjecting their child to the same procedure. This inner conflict can strain relationships between parents, especially if one parent feels strongly against the procedure but is overruled.

Moreover, fathers who witness the procedure or its aftermath often report feelings of guilt or distress. These emotions can ripple through the family dynamic, further complicating the bonding process for everyone involved.

 

Alternatives: A Better Way Forward

The good news? Circumcision is entirely avoidable. Here’s how parents can make decisions that prioritize bonding and emotional well-being:

  1. Educate Yourself: Learn about the risks and benefits of circumcision, as well as the cultural myths surrounding it. Many parents find that the supposed “benefits” of circumcision don’t hold up under scrutiny.
  2. Trust Your Instincts: If something about circumcision doesn’t sit right with you, listen to that feeling. Your baby’s health and happiness don’t depend on a procedure rooted in outdated traditions.
  3. Advocate for Immediate Bonding: Insist on skin-to-skin contact and avoid unnecessary separations in the hospital. The first hours and days after birth are precious—don’t let them be interrupted by a preventable procedure.
  4. Find Support: If you’re feeling pressure to circumcise, seek out support groups or resources that align with your values. Connecting with other parents who have faced similar decisions can be empowering.

 

A Personal Note to Mothers

To all the mothers out there struggling with this decision or grappling with regret, you’re not alone. The system is stacked against you, inundating you with half-truths and cultural pressure. But your instincts matter. Your bond with your baby is sacred, and no tradition or medical sales pitch should come between it.

If you’ve already chosen circumcision and feel regret, give yourself grace. We’re all navigating parenthood the best we can with the information we have. What matters most is the love and connection you build with your child moving forward.

If you found this article enlightening, enraging, or engaging, you might also be interested in Championing Change: Effective Ways to Support Intactivism

 

People Also Ask These Questions About How Circumcision Affects the Early Bonding Process Between Mother and Child

Q: How does circumcision impact the physical closeness between a mother and her newborn?

  • A: Circumcision often leads to discomfort and crying in infants, which can interfere with the natural bonding moments, such as skin-to-skin contact, immediately after birth.

Q: Does the stress of circumcision affect the infant’s ability to nurse?

  • A: The stress and pain from circumcision can make it harder for newborns to latch and breastfeed effectively, potentially disrupting breastfeeding and mother-child bonding.

Q: Can circumcision increase separation time between mother and baby in the hospital?

  • A: Yes, circumcision procedures often result in additional time away from the mother for preparation, surgery, and recovery, which can limit early bonding opportunities.

Q: What emotional effects might circumcision have on the mother?

  • A: Mothers may feel distressed or helpless when hearing their baby cry in pain during and after circumcision, potentially affecting their confidence and emotional state during the bonding period.

Q: What alternatives to circumcision support the natural bonding process?

  • A: Educating families on proper hygiene and foreskin care can eliminate the perceived need for circumcision while preserving the opportunity for early bonding.

Author

No Comments

Post a Comment

Skin in the Game Awards

Join us to honor Alan Cumming at the Inaugural Skin in the Game Awards.

4.30.25, NYC

For More Information

Marilyn

Marilyn Fayre Milos, multiple award winner for her humanitarian work to end routine infant circumcision in the United States and advocating for the rights of infants and children to genital autonomy, has written a warm and compelling memoir of her path to becoming “the founding mother of the intactivist movement.” Needing to support her family as a single mother in the early sixties, Milos taught banjo—having learned to play from Jerry Garcia (later of The Grateful Dead)—and worked as an assistant to comedian and social critic Lenny Bruce, typing out the content of his shows and transcribing court proceedings of his trials for obscenity. After Lenny’s death, she found her voice as an activist as part of the counterculture revolution, living in Haight Ashbury in San Francisco during the 1967 Summer of Love, and honed her organizational skills by creating an alternative education open classroom (still operating) in Marin County. 

After witnessing the pain and trauma of the circumcision of a newborn baby boy when she was a nursing student at Marin College, Milos learned everything she could about why infants were subjected to such brutal surgery. The more she read and discovered, the more convinced she became that circumcision had no medical benefits. As a nurse on the obstetrical unit at Marin General Hospital, she committed to making sure parents understood what circumcision entailed before signing a consent form. Considered an agitator and forced to resign in 1985, she co-founded NOCIRC (National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers) and began organizing international symposia on circumcision, genital autonomy, and human rights. Milos edited and published the proceedings from the above-mentioned symposia and has written numerous articles in her quest to end circumcision and protect children’s bodily integrity. She currently serves on the board of directors of Intact America.

Georganne

Georganne Chapin is a healthcare expert, attorney, social justice advocate, and founding executive director of Intact America, the nation’s most influential organization opposing the U.S. medical industry’s penchant for surgically altering the genitals of male children (“circumcision”). Under her leadership, Intact America has definitively documented tactics used by U.S. doctors and healthcare facilities to pathologize the male foreskin, pressure parents into circumcising their sons, and forcibly retract the foreskins of intact boys, creating potentially lifelong, iatrogenic harm. 

Chapin holds a BA in Anthropology from Barnard College, and a Master’s degree in Sociomedical Sciences from Columbia University. For 25 years, she served as president and chief executive officer of Hudson Health Plan, a nonprofit Medicaid insurer in New York’s Hudson Valley. Mid-career, she enrolled in an evening law program, where she explored the legal and ethical issues underlying routine male circumcision, a subject that had interested her since witnessing the aftermath of the surgery conducted on her younger brother. She received her Juris Doctor degree from Pace University School of Law in 2003, and was subsequently admitted to the New York Bar. As an adjunct professor, she taught Bioethics and Medicaid and Disability Law at Pace, and Bioethics in Dominican College’s doctoral program for advanced practice nurses.

In 2004, Chapin founded the nonprofit Hudson Center for Health Equity and Quality, a company that designs software and provides consulting services designed to reduce administrative complexities, streamline and integrate data collection and reporting, and enhance access to care for those in need. In 2008, she co-founded Intact America.

Chapin has published many articles and op-ed essays, and has been interviewed on local, national and international television, radio and podcasts about ways the U.S. healthcare system prioritizes profits over people’s basic needs. She cites routine (nontherapeutic) infant circumcision as a prime example of a practice that wastes money and harms boys and the men they will become. This Penis Business: A Memoir is her first book.