• Our Team
  • Initiatives
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Support Us
  • Donate

How Circumcision Gaslit an Entire Generation

circumcision

The Clean Cut That Wasn’t So Clean After All

Imagine being told your entire life that something was taken from you—for your own good. That it made you cleaner. More attractive. Less prone to disease. That it was just a little skin. That you were lucky.

Now imagine finding out, years or decades later, that none of that was true.

What you lost wasn’t minor. It was functional, sensual, protective. It was yours. You were never asked. The people you trusted didn’t question it. Or worse—they did, and still went through with it.

That’s not just misinformation. That’s gaslighting.

What Circumcision Really Took from a Generation

Circumcision didn’t just take the foreskin. It took autonomy. It rewrote the default for what a “normal” body looks like. It normalized amputation and called it healthcare. It stole consent, pleasure, and wholeness—before most boys even had a name.

And it was all wrapped in a glossy package of health, hygiene, and cultural expectation. But once you start pulling at the threads, the entire narrative unravels.

The Hygiene Hoax: Foreskin Isn’t Dirty—But This Lie Is

The most persistent myth? Circumcision is necessary for cleanliness.

The foreskin is not some unclean anomaly. It’s a self-cleaning, protective part of the male anatomy—especially during infancy. In adulthood, it requires no more care than brushing your teeth or washing your hands.

If hygiene were truly the issue, we’d be removing tonsils and toenails en masse. Or, to take it to the absurd: eyelids to avoid pink eye. But we don’t. Because it’s unnecessary. And because we value the body as whole.

So why is foreskin different?

The answer isn’t science. It’s cultural obsession. America’s fixation on genital “neatness” reveals more about its discomfort with bodies than any valid medical rationale.

Meanwhile, countries with the lowest circumcision rates—like Sweden, Germany, and Japan—also have some of the lowest rates of penile infections and disease. No mass cutting. Just basic hygiene.

Medical Mythology: Circumcision Is a Business, Not a Benefit

Circumcision was sold to American parents as a clean, clinical norm. Hospitals presented it as a routine, painless, and preventative step—just another box to check after birth.

But what they didn’t explain was what the foreskin actually does—or what’s lost when it’s removed.

We’re talking about over 20,000 nerve endings. A gliding mechanism that supports natural lubrication, reduced friction during sex, and heightened sensitivity. It’s not “extra skin.” It’s a living, functional structure.

So why does it still happen?

One word: profit.

Hospitals make hundreds per procedure. Multiply that by millions of births. Add in the downstream revenue from complications. Sprinkle in foreskin tissue sold to biotech companies and cosmetic labs for research and regenerative products.

Yes—you read that right. The body part taken from baby boys is sometimes sold and used in anti-aging skincare and medical research. That’s not medicine. That’s exploitation.

Faith, Tradition, and the Illusion of Consent

For some families, circumcision is rooted in religious or cultural tradition. That’s real—and deeply emotional. But tradition doesn’t equal informed consent. Belief isn’t ownership.

We don’t let parents tattoo or pierce their babies. Why should cutting a healthy body part be an exception?

Bodily autonomy must transcend tradition. Faith should be a personal decision—not a permanent scar.

Even within religious communities, change is happening. Groups like Jews Against Circumcision and Beyond the Bris are challenging the status quo, advocating for ethical alternatives like Brit Shalom—a non-cutting naming ceremony.

Spirituality doesn’t require blood. Only control does.

The Hidden Grief of the Intact Generation

For many men, the loss doesn’t register until something triggers it: a conversation with a partner, a documentary, or a late-night scroll past a video on foreskin restoration.

And then comes the storm: disbelief, anger, shame, sorrow. But there’s no ritual for this kind of grief. No language for it. No place to mourn something you weren’t allowed to miss.

The grief is invisible—but very real.

This generation of men was taught not to question. Not to feel. And if they do? They’re dismissed. Mocked. Told to “get over it.” Laughed off as fringe or “anti-science.”

But feelings don’t disappear because they’re inconvenient. And you can’t gaslight someone forever.

Why Most Men Stay Silent

Speaking up about circumcision is taboo. It’s emotional, politicized, and misunderstood. Men who express anger or grief are often met with ridicule or disbelief. They’re told:

  • “It’s not a big deal.”
  • “You turned out fine.”
  • “You’re lucky you didn’t have problems.”

This is how the cycle stays alive. The silence isn’t natural—it’s enforced.

But it’s cracking.

Online communities of intact men are growing. More parents are questioning hospital forms. More people are realizing this isn’t a fringe issue—it’s a human rights one.

Breaking the Cycle: Why It Matters Now

This article isn’t about blaming parents who didn’t know better. It’s about ending the cycle of unquestioned harm.

It’s about the next baby. The next parent. The next conversation that could prevent unnecessary trauma.

You might not be able to undo what was done to you. But you can choose differently for your children. You can speak up. You can be angry. And you should be.

Because the next generation deserves the truth.

What You Can Do

  • Share this article. Silence helps no one. Awareness spreads through conversations.
  • Talk to your partner. Before you have kids, get on the same page.
  • Say “no thanks” to routine circumcision. You don’t owe a doctor polite compliance.
  • Support organizations like Intact America. Your dollars, time, and voice matter.
  • Normalize the intact body. Talk about it. Teach your kids about consent and ownership of their bodies.

 

The Bottom Line

Circumcision gaslit a generation. It normalized harm. It buried grief. It sold a lie in the name of science, cleanliness, and tradition.

But we are not broken. We are waking up. And we are not going back to sleep.

Let’s end this for good. Not just for ourselves—but for every child born whole.

Let them stay that way.

Join us in defending and honoring bodily autonomy.

Author

No Comments

Post a Comment

Marilyn

Marilyn Fayre Milos, multiple award winner for her humanitarian work to end routine infant circumcision in the United States and advocating for the rights of infants and children to genital autonomy, has written a warm and compelling memoir of her path to becoming “the founding mother of the intactivist movement.” Needing to support her family as a single mother in the early sixties, Milos taught banjo—having learned to play from Jerry Garcia (later of The Grateful Dead)—and worked as an assistant to comedian and social critic Lenny Bruce, typing out the content of his shows and transcribing court proceedings of his trials for obscenity. After Lenny’s death, she found her voice as an activist as part of the counterculture revolution, living in Haight Ashbury in San Francisco during the 1967 Summer of Love, and honed her organizational skills by creating an alternative education open classroom (still operating) in Marin County. 

After witnessing the pain and trauma of the circumcision of a newborn baby boy when she was a nursing student at Marin College, Milos learned everything she could about why infants were subjected to such brutal surgery. The more she read and discovered, the more convinced she became that circumcision had no medical benefits. As a nurse on the obstetrical unit at Marin General Hospital, she committed to making sure parents understood what circumcision entailed before signing a consent form. Considered an agitator and forced to resign in 1985, she co-founded NOCIRC (National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers) and began organizing international symposia on circumcision, genital autonomy, and human rights. Milos edited and published the proceedings from the above-mentioned symposia and has written numerous articles in her quest to end circumcision and protect children’s bodily integrity. She currently serves on the board of directors of Intact America.

Georganne

Georganne Chapin is a healthcare expert, attorney, social justice advocate, and founding executive director of Intact America, the nation’s most influential organization opposing the U.S. medical industry’s penchant for surgically altering the genitals of male children (“circumcision”). Under her leadership, Intact America has definitively documented tactics used by U.S. doctors and healthcare facilities to pathologize the male foreskin, pressure parents into circumcising their sons, and forcibly retract the foreskins of intact boys, creating potentially lifelong, iatrogenic harm. 

Chapin holds a BA in Anthropology from Barnard College, and a Master’s degree in Sociomedical Sciences from Columbia University. For 25 years, she served as president and chief executive officer of Hudson Health Plan, a nonprofit Medicaid insurer in New York’s Hudson Valley. Mid-career, she enrolled in an evening law program, where she explored the legal and ethical issues underlying routine male circumcision, a subject that had interested her since witnessing the aftermath of the surgery conducted on her younger brother. She received her Juris Doctor degree from Pace University School of Law in 2003, and was subsequently admitted to the New York Bar. As an adjunct professor, she taught Bioethics and Medicaid and Disability Law at Pace, and Bioethics in Dominican College’s doctoral program for advanced practice nurses.

In 2004, Chapin founded the nonprofit Hudson Center for Health Equity and Quality, a company that designs software and provides consulting services designed to reduce administrative complexities, streamline and integrate data collection and reporting, and enhance access to care for those in need. In 2008, she co-founded Intact America.

Chapin has published many articles and op-ed essays, and has been interviewed on local, national and international television, radio and podcasts about ways the U.S. healthcare system prioritizes profits over people’s basic needs. She cites routine (nontherapeutic) infant circumcision as a prime example of a practice that wastes money and harms boys and the men they will become. This Penis Business: A Memoir is her first book.