Picture the press release:
“BREAKING: Newborn Genital Surgery Approved by Major Hospitals. No Medical Indication Required.”
A newborn, just hours old, is restrained on a plastic board, unable to move or speak. Without anesthesia—or with inadequate numbing—a scalpel is used to amputate the most sensitive tissue on his body. There’s bleeding. Screaming. Sometimes shock. Sometimes worse.
But it’s legal. Common. And covered by insurance.
Welcome to the world of routine infant circumcision in the United States.
Now imagine that this procedure had never existed—and someone proposed it today.
How fast would we shut it down?
In a world hyper-conscious about bodily autonomy, medical ethics, and trauma-informed care, a procedure like this wouldn’t just be controversial—it would be criminal. If circumcision were invented in 2025, it wouldn’t even make it past the first ethics board meeting.
But because it’s been around for generations, we call it tradition.
That’s the problem.
The Thought Experiment That Breaks It All Open
Let’s run a thought experiment.
Imagine a biotech startup unveiled a new pediatric “enhancement” procedure. The pitch? “We remove a healthy part of an infant boy’s penis—right after birth. Don’t worry, he won’t remember it.”
No long-term studies. No medical necessity. No consent.
That company would be shut down overnight. It would be banned, buried in lawsuits, and probably prosecuted.
But this exact procedure is being performed every day—thousands of times a week—across American hospitals.
Why?
Because we’ve inherited a lie. Wrapped in science. Cloaked in culture. Swaddled in silence.
The Lie: “It’s Medicine”
Circumcision has been sold to parents under the false premise that it’s a medical necessity. But here’s the truth: It is not a treatment. It is not a cure. It is not preventive care.
It is a non-therapeutic, elective cosmetic surgery performed on a person who cannot give consent.
Circumcision doesn’t address any existing condition in a healthy newborn. It removes tissue that has done nothing wrong. It solves no problem. It serves no immediate purpose.
If anything, it creates problems: risks of infection, bleeding, excessive pain, adhesions, meatal stenosis, erectile issues, and psychological trauma. Not to mention the permanent loss of sexual function due to the removal of tens of thousands of nerve endings.
And all of this happens before the baby can lift his own head.
“It Doesn’t Hurt” Is a Dangerous Lie
For decades, doctors claimed that babies didn’t feel pain the way adults do. That was a convenient myth—used to justify unnecessary trauma.
We now know the truth: newborns feel pain more intensely than adults because their nervous systems are raw and undeveloped.
Circumcision without anesthesia is torture. Even with anesthesia, the pain is real, prolonged, and imprinted in the nervous system.
Babies scream until they turn purple. Some lose consciousness. Some go limp and dissociate. What we call “sleeping through it” is often the body going into shock to survive the trauma.
If a stranger did this to an animal, we’d press charges. If a man did it to a woman, we’d call it sexual violence.
But when it happens to boys, we call it love?
No Informed Consent = No Moral Ground
Let’s be blunt.
There is no version of informed consent when the patient is a baby. This is not a decision parents can make on behalf of their child—not ethically, not logically, not morally.
You cannot give away someone else’s body parts. You cannot consent to cosmetic surgery on someone else’s genitals.
Bodily autonomy isn’t age-gated. It doesn’t begin at puberty. It doesn’t wait for speech. It begins at birth—and ends at death.
To cut a baby’s genitals without medical need and without his consent is a direct violation of that autonomy.
No amount of good intentions can make that okay.
The Most Sensitive Tissue On the Male Body
So what exactly is being removed?
The foreskin isn’t “just skin.” It’s a functional, purposeful, complex structure. It contains tens of thousands of nerve endings, specialized protective cells, and unique erogenous zones found nowhere else on the body.
It protects the head of the penis, provides lubrication during sexual activity, and contributes significantly to sexual pleasure—for both partners.
Removing it isn’t harmless. It’s not neutral. It’s a lifetime alteration.
And it’s not reversible.
The Hygiene Excuse Doesn’t Hold Up
“It’s cleaner.”
Let’s challenge that.
We don’t amputate toes to prevent athlete’s foot. We don’t cut out tonsils preemptively. We don’t remove eyelids to prevent pink eye. We teach hygiene.
We teach kids to brush their teeth. To wash behind their ears. To clean their own genitals.
And guess what? Boys in intact-majority countries like Sweden, Norway, Germany, and Japan are not dropping dead from foreskin-related disease. They’re healthy, thriving, and whole—without surgical intervention.
The hygiene excuse is lazy. And insulting. It assumes boys can’t learn basic self-care. That their bodies are dirty by default.
That’s not medicine. That’s misogyny in a new disguise.
“He Should Look Like His Dad” Isn’t a Reason. It’s a Trauma Cycle.
This excuse is heartbreaking.
“He should look like his father.”
But what are we really saying?
That the father was cut against his will, so the son should be too?
That a traumatic legacy must be repeated for symmetry?
It’s not logic—it’s a trauma echo.
And you don’t pass on pain to feel less alone in it.
Your child is not born to mirror your wounds. Let him be whole, even if you weren’t given that choice.
The Global Double Standard
Let’s get real about hypocrisy.
When girls are subjected to genital cutting in other countries—even for cultural or religious reasons—we call it what it is: mutilation. We condemn it as a violation of human rights. We criminalize it. We fight to end it.
But when it happens to boys here? We call it “routine.”
One is condemned by international law. The other is scheduled by a hospital receptionist.
That’s not equality. That’s gender-based violence with a PR team.
This Isn’t About “Anti-Religion.” It’s About Anti-Violation.
We’ve been told that circumcision is a religious mandate. But even within religious communities, not everyone agrees.
Jewish and Muslim families around the world are choosing not to circumcise. They’re choosing alternative rituals like brit shalom, which honor faith while respecting the child’s bodily autonomy.
Because real faith doesn’t require force. And tradition doesn’t need a scalpel.
Religious freedom ends where another person’s body begins.
Your child’s body is not yours to sacrifice.
We Don’t Talk About the Men Who Regret It
There’s a growing movement of men speaking out about their circumcision experiences. Some are angry. Some are devastated. Some feel violated.
They describe reduced sensitivity. Lifelong discomfort. Sexual dysfunction. Psychological trauma. A sense of loss so profound they struggle to articulate it.
But their stories are often dismissed. Mocked. Buried beneath shame and gaslighting.
Why?
Because we don’t want to admit we’ve allowed a normalized form of genital violence. We don’t want to face what we’ve done—or what was done to us.
So we silence them.
But silence doesn’t equal healing.
And the truth doesn’t go away just because it’s inconvenient.
If You’ve Circumcised a Child, This Isn’t About Guilt. It’s About Change.
If you’re a parent who circumcised your son, this isn’t here to shame you. You were likely doing what you thought was right. You trusted your doctor. You trusted your culture. You did what you were told.
But now, you have more information. And with that comes power—not shame.
We can’t change the past. But we can change the future. We can talk about it. We can break the silence. We can make sure that no parent is ever misled into thinking this is necessary.
This movement isn’t about blame. It’s about protection. For the next baby. For the next family. For the next generation of men.
What If He Wants It Later?
Let’s say you’re still on the fence. “What if he wants it when he’s older?”
Here’s the deal: if he grows up and wants to be circumcised, that’s his decision. You can always cut later. You can never uncut.
Give him the option to choose. Because he’s the one who has to live in that body for the rest of his life.
The Future Is Intact
More and more parents are saying no. More and more hospitals are quietly backing away. More and more insurance companies are removing coverage.
The tide is turning.
We are witnessing a generational shift. One that values consent over conformity. Ethics over tradition. Wholeness over fear.
Someday soon, people will look back on routine infant circumcision with horror. Just like we do now with bloodletting. Or frontal lobotomies. Or foot binding.
Because cutting healthy genitals without consent? That’s not modern medicine. That’s an outdated practice begging to be left behind.
Ask Yourself
If your son could speak the moment he was born, would he ask you to protect his body—or alter it permanently?
Would he beg you to leave him whole?
Would he say, “Wait for me to decide?”
Listen closely.
Because silence isn’t consent. And the absence of protest doesn’t mean approval.
Someday, he might ask: “Why did you let them take a part of me—before I even knew what it was?”
You deserve the full story. And so does he.
Let’s stop normalizing the unthinkable. Let’s make wholeness the new standard. Let’s make intact the new normal.
Because his body belongs to him—no exceptions.
No Comments