• Our Story
  • Our Team
  • Initiatives
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Support Us
  • Donate

Proud to be an Intactivist: Embracing Our Identity in a Digitally Transparent World

Intactivism advocacy

I would be lying if I said that the thought of simply Googling my name didn’t arouse a bit of dread in my body. In fact, I seldom do it. And when I do, I usually quickly scan the results, have a brief chuckle to myself and close the browser. My name is one of a kind on the Internet since “Zeldis” is an extremely uncommon last name. Couple it with just about any first name and you almost always will have a unique pairing. In the pre-Internet days this was not an issue. These days, it guarantees that any information on the Internet about you will immediately be revealed to any interested party.

As you may have guessed, the search results for my name are littered with references to my intactivism. I have been an intactivist since the age of 15 (I am now 41) and while I am comfortable discussing the topic with anyone, it can still often feel like a burden to have to bring into a new friendship or relationship. How will I be judged? Will they think I am crazy? Do they already have strongly held pro-circumcision beliefs that will create tense debate? What seems even more burdensome is the idea that someone might learn about my intactivism through a web search where I am unable to even discuss the topic with them. Then I am simply judged as eccentric for caring about an issue that nobody else seems to even bother discussing — and not only that — it’s about penises! At times in my life, the fear was palpable that my name simply yielded too many circumcision-related results and that this would lead to me never being able to find a new job or easily acquire relationships and friends.

But I have overcome these fears, and you can too! Let’s start with a few places that we can likely all agree: 1) circumcision is wrong and harmful and most people don’t realize that, 2) circumcision affects us all (those not cut themselves are related to those that are or one day must make the choice to cut) and 3) any publicity for our cause is good publicity. If all of these are true, then we are uniquely positioned to pique someone’s curiosity in the subject of circumcision if they are so interested in us that they need to Google our names! I know for a fact (because people have told me) that they were surprised to read about my participation in the movement only to tell me that they had never thought of it before and were intrigued or simply agreed with the position. Girlfriends, bosses, co-workers, you name it — they have all at some point in my life brought up the subject to me. And if I find it burdensome to bring up the subject myself, then surely this is a boon in the form of less work for me!

Has it ever been brought up in a negative light? Of course! I can remember a time that a co-worker had Googled me and had begun telling others in the office about my intactivism as though it was something to be ashamed of. Did I get fired, lose friends or become ostracized? No, I did not. The situation opened an opportunity to have a discussion with people who were interested in why I would care. Here I was with my worst fear being realized and all that had happened was that I got a chance to educate others about something that I care deeply about.

My name has been attached to the anti-genital cutting movement online for 13 years and I have never once lost a relationship that I didn’t want to lose from it. What do I mean by this? I like to think of my extreme “Googleability” as a litmus test. If my involvement in the cause to end the genital cutting of children puts someone off so much that they will refuse to hire me or be in a relationship with me then I am happy that such a relationship was never given the space to exist in the first place. The digital trail that comes with our activism is both a great filter and a great conversation starter.

The irony of all of this is that we are not the ones that should be hiding when we are not the ones doing the cutting! The inverse should be true. Let’s let the circumcisers stand shamefully in the shadows as that is where they belong. I would imagine that none of us would be talking about babies’ penises if we didn’t live in a world that was obsessed with cutting them. We are not the weird ones. We are the ones telling the weird ones to stop harming children. It’s time that we started to become proud of that.

—Adam Zeldis

 

Author

No Comments

Post a Comment

Marilyn

Marilyn Fayre Milos, multiple award winner for her humanitarian work to end routine infant circumcision in the United States and advocating for the rights of infants and children to genital autonomy, has written a warm and compelling memoir of her path to becoming “the founding mother of the intactivist movement.” Needing to support her family as a single mother in the early sixties, Milos taught banjo—having learned to play from Jerry Garcia (later of The Grateful Dead)—and worked as an assistant to comedian and social critic Lenny Bruce, typing out the content of his shows and transcribing court proceedings of his trials for obscenity. After Lenny’s death, she found her voice as an activist as part of the counterculture revolution, living in Haight Ashbury in San Francisco during the 1967 Summer of Love, and honed her organizational skills by creating an alternative education open classroom (still operating) in Marin County. 

After witnessing the pain and trauma of the circumcision of a newborn baby boy when she was a nursing student at Marin College, Milos learned everything she could about why infants were subjected to such brutal surgery. The more she read and discovered, the more convinced she became that circumcision had no medical benefits. As a nurse on the obstetrical unit at Marin General Hospital, she committed to making sure parents understood what circumcision entailed before signing a consent form. Considered an agitator and forced to resign in 1985, she co-founded NOCIRC (National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers) and began organizing international symposia on circumcision, genital autonomy, and human rights. Milos edited and published the proceedings from the above-mentioned symposia and has written numerous articles in her quest to end circumcision and protect children’s bodily integrity. She currently serves on the board of directors of Intact America.

Georganne

Georganne Chapin is a healthcare expert, attorney, social justice advocate, and founding executive director of Intact America, the nation’s most influential organization opposing the U.S. medical industry’s penchant for surgically altering the genitals of male children (“circumcision”). Under her leadership, Intact America has definitively documented tactics used by U.S. doctors and healthcare facilities to pathologize the male foreskin, pressure parents into circumcising their sons, and forcibly retract the foreskins of intact boys, creating potentially lifelong, iatrogenic harm. 

Chapin holds a BA in Anthropology from Barnard College, and a Master’s degree in Sociomedical Sciences from Columbia University. For 25 years, she served as president and chief executive officer of Hudson Health Plan, a nonprofit Medicaid insurer in New York’s Hudson Valley. Mid-career, she enrolled in an evening law program, where she explored the legal and ethical issues underlying routine male circumcision, a subject that had interested her since witnessing the aftermath of the surgery conducted on her younger brother. She received her Juris Doctor degree from Pace University School of Law in 2003, and was subsequently admitted to the New York Bar. As an adjunct professor, she taught Bioethics and Medicaid and Disability Law at Pace, and Bioethics in Dominican College’s doctoral program for advanced practice nurses.

In 2004, Chapin founded the nonprofit Hudson Center for Health Equity and Quality, a company that designs software and provides consulting services designed to reduce administrative complexities, streamline and integrate data collection and reporting, and enhance access to care for those in need. In 2008, she co-founded Intact America.

Chapin has published many articles and op-ed essays, and has been interviewed on local, national and international television, radio and podcasts about ways the U.S. healthcare system prioritizes profits over people’s basic needs. She cites routine (nontherapeutic) infant circumcision as a prime example of a practice that wastes money and harms boys and the men they will become. This Penis Business: A Memoir is her first book.